By Alexandra D. Datig
Remember how the President promised if Americans like his or her health insurance plan, they can keep it under Obamacare? Then it turned out millions of Americans were denied coverage from their own plan providers? Only months after the President’s statement turned out to be false he does it again with a statement so shockingly against his own policy, it can only lead us to conclude that if Americans like his and her drug policy, they can keep that too!
Remember how the President promised if Americans like his or her health insurance plan, they can keep it under Obamacare? Then it turned out millions of Americans were denied coverage from their own plan providers? Only months after the President’s statement turned out to be false he does it again with a statement so shockingly against his own policy, it can only lead us to conclude that if Americans like his and her drug policy, they can keep that too!
Make no mistake, President Obama’s
recent statement in the New Yorker regarding drug legalization was a calculated
attempt at persuading Americans to favor legalizing of drugs without coming
right out and saying it, in conflict with his own policies as well as the
Controlled Substances Act. That is why he
took the closet-legalizer approach by being careful to say to the New Yorker
“if someone says” this or that, meaning he didn’t say it, yet he encourages
drug legalization advocates to go-ahead and say it,… you know, wink-wink, sort
of… LOL.
Take for example his comments “if
we can come up with a negotiated dose of cocaine.” I am sober more than 15 years thank God, and
just like the President who admitted to cocaine use in his book “Dreams From My
Father” (1995), I too have used cocaine.
Knowing this, the President also knows that any cocaine user is aware,
there is no such thing as a “negotiated dose of cocaine,” because to even a
first-time user cocaine creates a fiendish craving for more. A lot more.
Therefore, to suggest there is an acceptable dose of cocaine to a
cocaine user is like saying there is an acceptable amount of gas to drive 1500
miles even though your gas tank that only holds 18 gallons. It has
also been scientifically documented that cocaine can create permanent unhealthy
changes in the brain, even for first-time users. The same goes for marijuana and many other drugs.
Here’s where the calculation
starts. After making these remarks
Americans should theoretically be thinking cocaine may be harmful, but wouldn’t
it be safer if it were legal? Would that
make it “better” for cocaine addicts? No
one is talking about how we should curb use except drug prevention
organizations who are seemingly falling on deaf ears. To the President, however, that is not the
point. After all, Americans have a right
to do what they want with his or her body, wink-wink... LOL. Caveats of cocaine addiction and death should
not be mentioned by the President of the United States? Really folks, this is what it has come to.
The President also said, “if
marijuana is fully legalized.” With that
statement he showed zero confidence in his own drug control strategy that
speaks against the legalization of marijuana by which he is expected to lead
the country! What Americans should be
asking is, if President Obama is no longer president, will marijuana be given
the same nonchalant and casual leeway?
My immediate guess is, no, it will not, regardless of whether a
Republican or a Democrat is occupying the White House.
To his comments about marijuana not
being as bad as alcohol? Bad? Is that the best he can do? For a Harvard Law School graduate to use the
word 'not as “bad”' seems plebian. How
about marijuana is not as impairing and intoxicating as alcohol, though it does
impair the user’s ability to reason at times. As a former member of the Choom Gang, the
President also knows what it means to be an experienced marijuana user. He likely knows how to self-dose and drive
stoned. He probably knows the difference
between Indica and Sativa and likely has had his fair share of Maui-wowie when
he lived in Hawaii. Does that make his
closer-legalizer approach more persuasive?
Sadly, the entire recreational
marijuana movement is built on the premise of alcohol prohibition. Instead of making a reasonable consumer-based
argument, drug legalization advocates have taken a model of radicalized
rebellion and personal right because, to quote the President, “marijuana is not
as bad as alcohol.” Like alcohol,
marijuana is slowly being made legal by dividing communities with radicalized
pro-drug propaganda and with his recent statements President Obama has shown he
is in lock-step with the hoodwinking pro-drug lobby.
If there ever is a negotiated
amount of legal meth as the President suggests in his interview with the New
Yorker, he should be the first to try some right before he gives a State of the
Union Address. Maybe then Americans can
decide if they think it is bad or "ok" or not.
At the end of the day, we do need to figure out how to take the black
market away from ruthless drug cartels.
By dividing Americans with conflicting drug laws and an outdated radicalized alcohol
prohibition model to aim at legalization, the President is only doing what he
knows how to do best. Divide America by
sounding like a crackpot.